Washington, November 14, 2026: U.S. President Donald Trump, Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin are planning to hold an unprecedented three-way meeting next Thursday on the sidelines of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) leaders’ summit in Shenzhen, China. The White House confirmed the plan on Friday, November 13, according to The Associated Press, setting up a rare diplomatic encounter involving the leaders of the world’s three largest nuclear powers.

Official 2025 presidential portrait of Donald Trump
Official 2025 presidential portrait of Donald Trump. Photo: Daniel Torok, released into the public domain by the photographer. Image source.

Associated Press reporters said White House spokeswoman Olivia Wales confirmed that the leaders intend to meet on the sidelines of the APEC gathering in Shenzhen. The meeting is expected to take place on Thursday, November 19, during the November 18–19 leaders’ summit. U.S. officials have described the proposed discussion as an opening for future dialogue rather than a session expected to produce immediate agreements.

China has also acknowledged that discussions are under way. In a November 13 press briefing, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said Beijing was “in communication with relevant parties regarding a meeting between the three heads of state” and would release further information when available. Her statement confirms diplomatic contact but does not, by itself, provide the final format, agenda or timetable for the meeting.

Chinese President Xi Jinping at a meeting in Beijing in December 2023
Xi Jinping at a meeting with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in Beijing in December 2023. Photo: Dati Bendo / European Union, licensed CC BY 4.0. Image source · Licence.

Shenzhen Summit Gives The Leaders A High-Stakes Diplomatic Setting

China’s Foreign Ministry announced on November 13 that Xi would chair the 33rd APEC Economic Leaders’ Meeting in Shenzhen from November 18 to 19. The Chinese president is also due to attend the APEC CEO Summit and hold bilateral meetings with visiting leaders. APEC brings together 21 member economies, making the event a major platform for discussions on trade, investment, regional security and economic cooperation.

The proposed three-way meeting would bring together leaders whose governments have competing interests but also significant influence over global security and the world economy. Washington and Beijing are managing a fragile trade understanding while competing over advanced technology, military influence and the future of the Indo-Pacific. Moscow remains at war with Ukraine and has deepened its strategic relationship with Beijing.

The possibility of a trilateral meeting had been discussed for months. Kremlin officials raised the idea ahead of the APEC summit, while China’s Foreign Ministry later confirmed that it was in contact with the relevant parties. The White House confirmation on Friday moves the proposal from diplomatic speculation to a publicly acknowledged plan, although the leaders’ final arrangements remain subject to further announcements.

Nuclear Arms Control Could Be A Central Topic

Trump has expressed interest in discussing nuclear arms control with Xi and Putin. The last remaining treaty limiting the strategic nuclear arsenals of the United States and Russia, New START, expired in February 2026, leaving the two countries without the same binding numerical limits that had governed their largest nuclear forces for more than a decade.

The Associated Press reported that Trump wants a new, modernised agreement that includes China. Pentagon estimates cited by AP put China’s nuclear stockpile at more than 600 warheads, compared with more than 5,000 each for the United States and Russia. The difference in arsenal size is one reason Beijing has shown little interest in entering negotiations built around the existing U.S.-Russia framework.

Official portrait of Russian President Vladimir Putin
Official portrait of Vladimir Putin. Photo: Presidential Press and Information Office / Kremlin.ru, licensed CC BY 4.0. Image source · Licence.

The White House had already stated in a September 25 fact sheet that Trump advocated trilateral arms-control negotiations involving the United States, Russia and China. That policy position gives the proposed meeting a potential security dimension, but it does not mean that Beijing has agreed to negotiate a treaty or that the three governments are close to a common framework.

U.S. officials told AP that no agreement is expected to be announced at the meeting. The more realistic immediate objective may be to establish whether the three governments can begin a sustained conversation about nuclear risk, strategic stability and the conditions required for future arms-control negotiations.

Ukraine And Iran Add Complexity To The Talks

The proposed meeting is also taking place amid the war in Ukraine and the continuing conflict involving Iran. Trump has indicated that he wants to discuss the Iran war with Xi and Putin. A senior U.S. official told AP that the president would steer away from making Ukraine the focus of the trilateral discussion, although Moscow has sought opportunities to raise the conflict directly with Washington.

That prospect has unsettled some European leaders. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said on Friday that Europe wanted no unexpected outcome from Trump’s expected talks with Putin. Speaking at a European Political Community summit in Dublin, Merz urged Washington to remain aligned with Europe and Ukraine and warned against a repeat of the Anchorage meeting, which European governments viewed as a potentially decisive moment in the diplomatic effort to end the war.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has also expressed concern that a settlement affecting Ukraine could be discussed without Kyiv’s participation. The Guardian’s diplomatic analysis on Saturday examined fears that the three leaders could use the meeting to negotiate broader spheres of influence. Those concerns remain political assessments rather than evidence that any agreement has been reached.

Why The Meeting Matters Even Without An Immediate Deal

The three governments have different reasons for taking part. Trump could use the encounter to demonstrate that Washington remains central to negotiations on nuclear security and major international conflicts. Xi will host the leaders on Chinese territory at a summit designed to showcase China’s regional leadership and its commitment to economic cooperation. Putin would gain diplomatic visibility from appearing alongside the leaders of the United States and China while Russia remains under pressure over the war in Ukraine.

Analysts cited by AP have cautioned that the meeting could be more symbolic than substantive. China’s nuclear arsenal is smaller than those of the United States and Russia, and Beijing has not shown a strong appetite for joining a three-country arms-control arrangement. The leaders’ competing positions on Ukraine, Iran and the future of global security could also limit the scope for concrete outcomes.

Nevertheless, even a short meeting could create channels for further discussion if the leaders agree on a practical agenda and follow-up process. The next test will be whether the encounter produces sustained diplomatic work or remains primarily a high-profile image at the APEC summit.

HeadlinesXtra Analysis

The planned meeting is important because it brings three governments with enormous military and economic influence into the same diplomatic setting at a time when several international security arrangements are under strain. The expiration of New START makes renewed arms-control dialogue more urgent, but a meeting alone cannot replace verification systems, agreed limits or a durable treaty framework.

China’s participation will be especially consequential. Beijing may be willing to discuss strategic stability and crisis communication without accepting numerical limits designed around much larger American and Russian arsenals. Any serious negotiation would need to address that imbalance and establish what each government is prepared to disclose, limit and verify.

The Ukraine question is equally important. Diplomacy between powerful states can help reduce conflict, but an arrangement affecting Ukraine’s territory or security cannot be considered legitimate or durable if Ukraine is excluded from decisions about its future. European governments also have direct security interests that cannot be set aside by a conversation among three presidents.

For now, the most responsible assessment is that the meeting is planned, the Chinese Foreign Ministry has confirmed communication among the parties, and the agenda remains unsettled. Its significance should be judged by the substance of any follow-up talks rather than the spectacle of the leaders sharing a room.

Sources and Further Reading