WASHINGTON, D.C. — November 11, 2026: U.S. Representative Jim Jordan of Ohio has been elected to lead House Republicans in the next Congress, giving the party a combative and prominent ally of President Donald Trump as it prepares to move into the minority after sweeping midterm defeats. Jordan defeated House Majority Leader Steve Scalise of Louisiana by 106 votes to 73 in a closed-door Republican conference election on Tuesday, November 10.

Archived official congressional portrait of Jim Jordan of Ohio.
Archived official congressional portrait of Jim Jordan. Photo: United States Congress. Original file and rights information — public domain as a U.S. federal government work.

The result places Jordan at the head of the House Republican conference for the 120th Congress, which begins in January 2027. He will not become Speaker of the House: the minority leader is the senior party leader for the group outside the majority, responsible for organising its political strategy, coordinating members and directing its response to the governing party’s legislative and oversight agenda.

The leadership change follows a major electoral setback for Republicans. Democrats won control of both chambers in the November 3 midterm elections, ending the GOP’s congressional majorities and creating a difficult final two years for Trump’s administration. Republicans will have to decide how to oppose Democratic proposals, defend the president’s agenda and rebuild their electoral position ahead of the 2028 elections.

Jordan Defeats Scalise in Closed-Door Vote

Jordan, 62, won the contest by 33 votes. Scalise, who has served as House majority leader, entered the race with extensive leadership and fundraising experience. He argued that Republicans needed unity and a steady hand after the midterm losses. Jordan’s supporters, by contrast, emphasised his experience confronting Democrats in committee hearings and his ability to communicate the party’s opposition to the incoming majority.

Jordan said after the result that Republicans would fight for American families over the next two years. He argued that the party would present its approach as a defence of freedom when Democrats proposed expanding government. His remarks pointed to a strategy built around public messaging, committee work and opposition to parts of the Democratic agenda.

Interior view of the United States House of Representatives chamber in the Capitol.
The chamber of the U.S. House of Representatives in Washington, D.C. Photo: U.S. House of Representatives / Office of the Speaker. Original file and rights information — public domain.

Representative Tom Emmer of Minnesota was elected Republican whip, the party’s second-ranking House leadership position, while Representative Lisa McClain of Michigan retained the conference chair role. The choices give Jordan a leadership team that will be responsible for maintaining discipline and coordinating Republicans across committees, floor votes and public communications.

Mike Johnson’s Exit Opens a New Chapter

Jordan’s election follows Speaker Mike Johnson’s decision not to seek the Republican leadership post after the party’s midterm losses. Johnson told colleagues he wanted to devote more time to his wife and children. His departure from the leadership contest created an opening for Jordan and Scalise to compete for the role.

Jordan had signalled his ambitions before the vote. In a November 4 letter to Republican colleagues, he called for a leadership team that would be active, engaged and prepared to confront an energetic Democratic majority. The letter argued that the party needed a clearer plan for the coming Congress rather than reacting to political developments one day at a time.

Republicans also selected Senator John Thune of South Dakota to continue leading their Senate conference. Thune was chosen by acclamation. His return gives the party continuity in the upper chamber, where Democrats will hold the majority but will still need Republican support for many measures because most major legislation requires 60 votes to overcome a filibuster.

Exterior view of the United States Capitol building in Washington, D.C.
The United States Capitol in Washington, D.C. Photo: Simon Gagner / Trendscope. Original photograph | CC BY 4.0.

A More Confrontational Opposition Strategy

Jordan’s political profile is closely associated with the House Freedom Caucus, which he helped establish in 2015 and chaired in its early years. First elected to Congress in 2006, he has become one of the Republican Party’s most visible conservative voices and a staunch defender of Trump. His work as chairman of the House Judiciary Committee and previously as a senior Republican on the Oversight Committee has given him extensive experience leading investigations and challenging Democratic administrations.

That record is likely to shape the party’s approach to the new Congress. Democrats have promised investigations into Trump’s administration and intend to pursue an ambitious legislative programme. Jordan’s allies believe his committee experience will help Republicans scrutinise Democratic policies and challenge decisions by the incoming majority. Critics, however, argue that a strategy centred on confrontation could deepen partisan divisions and make bipartisan work more difficult.

Jordan’s record also remains controversial. He echoed Trump’s false claims that the 2020 presidential election was stolen. He has also denied allegations by former Ohio State wrestlers that he knew about sexual abuse committed by the university team doctor while Jordan was an assistant wrestling coach. Jordan has said he was unaware of the abuse; a university investigation found no hard evidence that he knew, while also documenting that students had complained about the doctor’s conduct in the presence of coaching staff.

Democratic lawmakers criticised the Republicans’ choice, arguing that the party had responded to its election defeat by elevating one of its most combative figures rather than choosing a leader who could appeal to a wider group of voters. Some Republicans had also called for a reassessment of the party’s direction after the losses, although Jordan’s victory suggests the conference favoured an assertive opposition approach.

What Jordan Must Deliver

The incoming minority leader faces several competing demands. He must keep a smaller Republican conference united, coordinate with Thune and Senate Republicans, defend Trump’s priorities where possible and decide when to negotiate with Democrats. He will also be expected to help the party rebuild support among voters who rejected Republican candidates in the midterms.

His influence will have limits. Democrats will control the House agenda and chair its committees, while the Senate’s rules will require cross-party support for many major bills. Trump will retain the presidential veto, but Democrats will not have the two-thirds majorities needed to override it. That balance creates incentives for confrontation, but it also makes negotiation unavoidable when both parties want legislation to become law.

Jordan is expected to take up the role when the new Congress convenes in January. Until then, Republicans remain responsible for completing the current congressional session, including government funding and the confirmation of pending nominees. The transition period will offer an early indication of whether the party intends to focus on legislative negotiations, investigations or a combination of both.

HeadlinesXtra Analysis

Jordan’s victory is a clear signal that House Republicans have chosen an opposition leader whose strength is political combat rather than consensus-building. That may energise the party’s conservative base and provide a disciplined response to Democratic investigations. It could also make the House a more adversarial institution at a time when voters are likely to expect Congress to address household costs, jobs, healthcare, immigration and the wider economic consequences of the Iran conflict.

The election does not, by itself, prove that Republicans have rejected every call for reflection after the midterms. Jordan’s supporters may believe his direct style is precisely what the party needs when it lacks control of the chamber. But the leadership contest does show that the conference placed a premium on confrontation and oversight experience over the steadier legislative profile offered by Scalise.

Jordan’s biggest challenge will be to distinguish effective oversight from political theatre. Investigations can expose genuine misconduct and improve accountability, but they can also lose public confidence if they appear designed only to punish opponents. A successful minority leader must show that scrutiny is evidence-led, that policy alternatives are credible and that the party can work across the aisle when the national interest requires it.

For Democrats, Jordan’s election may make it easier to frame the next Congress as a contest between an assertive governing majority and a highly confrontational Republican opposition. For Republicans, the test will be whether his leadership can turn that energy into a coherent programme that speaks to voters beyond the party’s most loyal supporters. The next two years will show whether Jordan can do more than lead the fight: he will have to help rebuild a party that has just lost control of Washington.

Sources and Further Reading